Differences in turn signal switch wiring shown in diagrams

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Kid, Casey 65

Post Reply
User avatar
FORDification
Posts: 119
Joined: July 12, 2006, 7:58 pm
Location: Nebraska
Contact:
United States of America

Differences in turn signal switch wiring shown in diagrams

Post by FORDification »

Finally got the 1965 Ford Truck Body Builders Layout Book today that includes the master wiring diagram. I decided to scan it and then (using Photoshop) layering it over the top of the 1966 diagram for comparison purposes. I found that the two diagrams are absolutely identical. They literally used the 1965 diagram to make the '66 version. All circuits are numbered and colored the same and have the exact same path...with one minor exception.

The main harness circuits going into the connector at the base of the steering column for the turn signal switch are identical...but the two diagrams seem to show a different destination for the circuits up inside the turn signal switch itself, after the connector.

Image

Image

So this made me wonder if this is another Ford engineering SNAFU that got past the proofreader or what, so I started doing some digging in the MPC to see if there was a different switch used between the '65 and '66 models. Here's what I found:

C0DZ-13341-A (less mounting plate)
61-62 F100/250 2WD

C2TZ-13341-D
61-66 F350, 61-65 F100/250 4WD, 66 F250 4WD

C3TZ-13341-B
63-64 F100/250 2WD

C9TZ-13341-C
65 F100/250 2WD, 66 F100 2WD/4WD, 66 F250 2WD, 67-69 F100/350 "Before Ser. G30,001"

As you can see, there were actually four different part numbers used for turn signal switches used in the Slicks era. The C0DZ-A switch came without a mounting plate, which was replaced with the C3TZ-B piece which included the mounting plate...which means it could also replace the earlier version, meaning there are actually only three different switches used.

So in a nutshell, the F350 and 4WD up through '66 used one switch, '61-'64 2WDs used a second one, and the third was used on '65-'66 2WDs and '66 4WDs.

Since the question here is why is the turn signal portion of the diagram different between the '65 and '66 diagram, this PN research seems to show that the turn signal portion of the wiring diagram is irrelevant, since the diagram is labeled "F100, F250 6 & 8 Cyl." and doesn't show actual application, meaning that essentially the wiring harnesses between the '65 and '66 trucks are identical. So which one is correct...and does it even matter?

Thoughts? I'm thinking about just editing the '66 colorized diagram I have to label it as '65 and '66 and using for both. Does anyone see any potential problems with that, or should I just colorize the '65 diagram as printed? (It wouldn't take more than 5 minutes to do, literally....since I could just edit the '66 diagram to reflect the minor differences in the TSS portion in the '65 diagram.)
Keith
FORDification.info | FORDification.com | FORDification.net
Image
Also own: '67 F100 2WD SWB - '68 F100 SWB 4WD choptop - '75 F250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
bruceandersson
Posts: 906
Joined: August 12, 2009, 9:44 am
Location: Ohio

Re: Differences in turn signal switch wiring shown in diagra

Post by bruceandersson »

From my experience, the switch is the same for 65/66 2 wd as is the wiring harness as a whole. Ford was very consistent in the color coding for the lights and turn signals over the year vehicles I've spent the most time with from 57-66. I think you could use the same diagram for both years. I even used a 64 harness in my 65 at one time. I had to change out the harness ends for the turn signal switch, but wire coding was the same. There was two wires I had to change at the firewall to connect the 64 dash harness to the 65 engine wiring.
Post Reply