offset vs. backspacing

Got a helpful tip or trick related to your slick? Please share...

Moderators: Kid, Casey 65

Post Reply
ICEMAN6166
Posts: 11470
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842
Poland

offset vs. backspacing

Post by ICEMAN6166 »

1966 F250 4x4
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
User avatar
slixtyfive
Posts: 443
Joined: January 19, 2007, 2:03 pm
Location: Eastern Iowa
United States of America

Re: offset vs. backspacing

Post by slixtyfive »

Everything i've ever seen or read about 'backspacing' indicated that it is actually the measurement from the wheel mount surface to the 'inside' edge of the rim. In other words, lay the wheel down on a flat surface with the outside of the wheel up and measure from that same flat surface up to the back of the wheel mount surface for your backspacing measurement. So kinda the 'inverse' of what is shown in the diagram above......?
"It's better to be gone but not forgotten, than to be forgotten but not gone." Gary Allan
User avatar
Toyz
Posts: 4333
Joined: March 22, 2011, 6:23 pm
Location: Baja Houston Taxes
United States of America

Re: offset vs. backspacing

Post by Toyz »

Your first sentence is largely correct. I guess one could measure in the way you describe, but it might be easier to lay the wheel with outside down and measure from mounting surface to a straight edge laid across the inside edge. That will put you fairly close to accurate backspacing. Correct backspacing will be larger with wider wheels, offset SHOULD remain nearly the same.
There's a lot of technology at work there. On dual bearing hubs, ideal situation is to have centerline of wheel centered between the bearings. Such things as "kingpin angle of inclination" also come into play, especially with modern anti-lock braking systems and diagonally separated systems. This is a major reason for the recent proliferation of high positive offset wheels.
Paul
The Ford Orphanage
Life's too short for boring vehicles!
My quest to develop a universal solvent is held up by the lack of a storage container.
Paul
User avatar
Toyz
Posts: 4333
Joined: March 22, 2011, 6:23 pm
Location: Baja Houston Taxes
United States of America

Re: offset vs. backspacing

Post by Toyz »

To further expound on this; F-series trucks prior to the late nineties, except dual wheel applications, came from the factory with a near-zero offset regardless of original wheel width. This holds true whether equipped with a 15x 4.5 wheel or a 16.5 x 9.75 wheel. CORRECT replacement wheels will stay close to this minimal offset to avoid poorer handling and additional bearing loading. This does not indicate that wheels with improper offset can't be run successfully; they often are, with little consequences.
The popular Jaguar, and especially Crown Vic, conversions are by no means exempt from this. Going to a neutral or negative offset on these applications not only widens the track, but can affect scrub radius due to the line formed by the KAI no longer being located outside of wheel centerline.
Too much information? Probably for most of our situations; but certainly worth consideration when replacing a high positive offset application with one with much less offset. Think of a dually wheel mounted on an F250 hub for instance. Railroad company vehicles do this for obvious reasons; they also tend to enforce low speed limitations when these vehicles are operated on roadways!
Paul
The Ford Orphanage
Life's too short for boring vehicles!
My quest to develop a universal solvent is held up by the lack of a storage container.
Paul
User avatar
slixtyfive
Posts: 443
Joined: January 19, 2007, 2:03 pm
Location: Eastern Iowa
United States of America

Re: offset vs. backspacing

Post by slixtyfive »

Toyz - Aren't you describing the exact same measurement?

My comments are just based on the descriptions I have typically seen for ordering wheels. From my experiences, the 'backspacing' as I noted above is what I have seen. Sometimes 'offset' and 'backspacing' are used interchangably. I'm not saying that is correct but just what i have experienced. I'm not trying to start a debate on this - again just pointing out that you need to be careful and be sure that communication lines are open when discussing these measurements.
"It's better to be gone but not forgotten, than to be forgotten but not gone." Gary Allan
User avatar
Toyz
Posts: 4333
Joined: March 22, 2011, 6:23 pm
Location: Baja Houston Taxes
United States of America

Re: offset vs. backspacing

Post by Toyz »

Yes, I am not sure what you are referring to as far as the diagram goes. It appears generally correct to me. As stated in a previous post, you are correct; back spacing and offset is often confused. Again, offset can, and should, remain very close to original where possible, while backspacing is dependent on, and should change with, wheel width.
To use Jeff's example; his new wheels with -12 mm offset stick out considerably further due to the increased width more so than the total of less than 1/2 inch change from stock offset.
Paul
The Ford Orphanage
Life's too short for boring vehicles!
My quest to develop a universal solvent is held up by the lack of a storage container.
Paul
User avatar
slixtyfive
Posts: 443
Joined: January 19, 2007, 2:03 pm
Location: Eastern Iowa
United States of America

Re: offset vs. backspacing

Post by slixtyfive »

I guess I made the assumption that the left side in the diagram is the 'outside' of the wheel since that is the general profile of wheels i typically deal with. But that assumption may be incorrect since it doesn't identify the which side is which.
"It's better to be gone but not forgotten, than to be forgotten but not gone." Gary Allan
User avatar
Toyz
Posts: 4333
Joined: March 22, 2011, 6:23 pm
Location: Baja Houston Taxes
United States of America

Re: offset vs. backspacing

Post by Toyz »

Sounds as if your monitor is about as poor as mine! The axle side is lightly lined in.
Paul
The Ford Orphanage
Life's too short for boring vehicles!
My quest to develop a universal solvent is held up by the lack of a storage container.
Paul
User avatar
slixtyfive
Posts: 443
Joined: January 19, 2007, 2:03 pm
Location: Eastern Iowa
United States of America

Re: offset vs. backspacing

Post by slixtyfive »

Really??? I didn't see that.

Now that I look closer I do see a couple light lines but I still can't make out exactly what it is showing...

My apologies....
"It's better to be gone but not forgotten, than to be forgotten but not gone." Gary Allan
User avatar
bird55
Posts: 558
Joined: February 16, 2009, 11:56 am
Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma
United States of America

Re: offset vs. backspacing

Post by bird55 »

Thx for postings, and good to see the discussion. It does make a difference and never ASSUME. :lol: I had very close tolerances on the last setup I did and all this was very important when ordering expensive aftermarket wheels! Always something new to learn.
Post Reply