351 to a 302 swap

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Kid, Casey 65

Post Reply
kid2
Posts: 252
Joined: July 26, 2006, 8:42 am

351 to a 302 swap

Post by kid2 »

Ok guys I am getting ready to swap a 302 into a neighbors 77 or 78 4x4 pickup. Are the bell bolt patterns and blocks the same and will the 302 bolt up.Will the flywheel from the 351 swap over to the 302 or is it different. His 351 is about to give up and he has a good 302 setting in his garage he wants to use. He wants to rebuild the 351 to put back in later so we dont want to have to change alot if we dont have to. Let me know what we need to do...........Kid
User avatar
jimbob1021
Posts: 171
Joined: September 10, 2006, 7:56 pm
Location: battle creek mi
Contact:

Post by jimbob1021 »

the 351 w is the same as a 70s 302 the 351m is not the same it has a larger bolt prttern for the bellhousing............jim
User avatar
jakdad
Posts: 1968
Joined: July 18, 2006, 4:07 pm
Location: Katy,Texas

Post by jakdad »

The 351M C-6 has the same bolt pattern as the FEs so will require a trans change if it is automatic. I don't know about the standards.
Jim
User avatar
banjopicker66
Posts: 1488
Joined: July 17, 2006, 1:59 pm
Location: Middlesboro, KY

Post by banjopicker66 »

Uh-oh, Jim.

The FE bell pattern is unique. Only FE engines will bolt to it, the 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427 and 428 being the most common in the FE Family.

The 351M-400 bell pattern is the same as the 385 Family of engines, the 370, 429 and 460.

The Windsor family is the 289, 302 and 351W. There are others of lower cubic capacity, but they came earlier then '65, and are more of a purist's or collector's interest than anything else.

If I remember correctly, the 240 and 300 inline 6 share the same bellhousing bolt pattern as the 302 and 351W.
User avatar
jakdad
Posts: 1968
Joined: July 18, 2006, 4:07 pm
Location: Katy,Texas

Post by jakdad »

Banjo, you are right! The small blocks and Clevelands use the same not 351M-400.
My bad
:oops: :oops:
:( :( :(
Jim
User avatar
banjopicker66
Posts: 1488
Joined: July 17, 2006, 1:59 pm
Location: Middlesboro, KY

Post by banjopicker66 »

So the question remains: Is the 351 in question a 351M/ or a 351W?
To summarize, if he is pulling out a 351M, the 302 won't match the existing bellhousing.
It will, if he is pulling out a 351W.
Satinblack
Posts: 49
Joined: November 24, 2006, 12:09 pm
Location: California

Post by Satinblack »

Yes 351C is same as small block 289/302 etc. Yea would help to know which 351 it is?
71 LONG BED
Posts: 90
Joined: November 13, 2006, 12:25 pm
Location: Hamburg, New Jersey

Post by 71 LONG BED »

The 351M was developed in 1975 to replace the 351C for use in large passenger cars. The 351M/400 engines were used in light-duty trucks starting in the 1977 model year. Assuming the 351 is original to the truck, I don't think the 302 will be a direct bolt in. :(
John
Image Image Image
ICEMAN6166
Posts: 11470
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842
Poland

Post by ICEMAN6166 »

IMO ,the 351M/400 is best used at the end of a chain on your boat.
never had one i liked.
i replaced one in a 78 f100 4x4 with a 429 and was amazed at the improvement.
1966 F250 4x4
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
didgeytrucker
Posts: 142
Joined: July 23, 2006, 4:07 pm

Post by didgeytrucker »

I would bet money the 351 in the '77 4x4 is a 351M. The 302 wil not bolt in directly. The engine mount towers might work. I know the transmission will not.

If the valve covers match on the two engines the swap will work. If the valve covers are different the swap will not work.

Tracy
1956 F-100 Panel w/429 (3.50 9")
1966 F-100 SWB w/351C (3.25 9" - 3.70 posi for Saturday nights)
Music City F-100's,
1965 GT-350 S/C (2.78 1st & 3.70 TracLok 9")
Music City Mustang Club
1969 Schwinn StingRay
Don't focus on the destination....make the JOURNEY the adventure
User avatar
FORDMANLCRACKEL
Posts: 1237
Joined: July 11, 2006, 9:48 pm
Location: williamston, n.c.
Contact:
United States of America

Post by FORDMANLCRACKEL »

didgetrucker is correct. My 66 is sitting on a 77 chassis it had the 351m. the motor towers will work on the 302 but you will need the bellhoiusing for the 302. The bolt patterns are different than the M. The bellhousing from a 240 to 351 W will work. Get the cast iron not the alum. My bell came from a 240 three on the tree. Flywheel will interchange for 302, 351C and 351W. you will need the one with 164 teeth. All the above is for four speed with granny first gear. If it is an automatic you will have to change the trans. 429 or 460 will bolt right in if its an automatic and the gass milage wont be any worse.

Lonnie
The most rewarding job i ever had was being a dad.
1988 Ranger Build http://s275.photobucket.com/albums/jj31 ... %20RANGER/
Post Reply