pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

Post Reply
User avatar
Anthony
Posts: 1422
Joined: July 12, 2010, 4:56 am
Location: Huntington, West Virginia
United States of America

pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by Anthony »

OK guys... I know there are a lot of opinions out there so here is the place to air them out. since my truck is off the hill and in the garage, it gives me time to dream up the next project. I now have a 4 speed with the "granny" gear which in reality, gives me 3 gears. I am not looking for 32 :shock: mpg's out of my Baby but I am looking to get all I can. I have the split exhaust from a 86 300 to go on it and am looking at the aftermarket intake also. I am sure I have read that this will help out a little as long as my foot stays out of the pedal. I am curious to the additional mpg's with the 5 speed instead of the 4 speed granny. will I still be able to tow my camper?? I have the divorced transfer case so I would just need a 2wd transmission and I think I could get one reasonable at one of the local yards...

just thought that on this snowy, cold Saturday I would throw some food out there for thought...

looking forward to everyone's opinions.... thanks
aarons428
Posts: 483
Joined: July 21, 2009, 9:18 pm
Location: norfolk NE
Germany

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by aarons428 »

I hope you have a "you pull it yard" close because around here the junk yards want more money out of used trans than a remaned one.
2010 Ford Edge
99 Ford Expedition
65 Ford f-100 swb
460 stock other than a double roller timing chain and a s475 TURBO pushing 6psi of boost (now 12lbs)
351 W Pulled and on garage floor in storage
428 4v (R.I.P)
c-6 wide ratio modified
torino front stub
home made ladder bar rear with air bags
11.96 sec @ 110mph 1\4mile (best with the 428)
User avatar
Anthony
Posts: 1422
Joined: July 12, 2010, 4:56 am
Location: Huntington, West Virginia
United States of America

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by Anthony »

http://huntington.craigslist.org/pts/2805356384.html


"Good used 5 speed transmission for ford 95 F150 straight 6, new clutch and press plate.
Can contact Jimmy at 606 " (quoted from ad)

I thought this was reasonable??? or at least around here... I gave $300 for a Chrysler 3 speed auto....
R Pope
Posts: 517
Joined: September 18, 2007, 7:53 pm
Location: sask

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by R Pope »

Lots of '90's pickups have 300's with Mazda-sourced M5R2 overdrives. I put one behind my 351.
cooter
Posts: 354
Joined: July 12, 2010, 6:45 pm
Location: Edmonton Alberta

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by cooter »

with the increased length of the od, the divorced tc might be a problem, maybe find a 4x4 tranny and tc. also i believe the tranny has a hydraulic clutch and the shifter location will probably be different. otherwise this should be a reasonable project
why put off till tommorow what you can put off alltogether
turtle1056
Posts: 314
Joined: November 2, 2006, 12:55 pm

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by turtle1056 »

you could just get the T5 spacer/adapter off of Ebay, and bolt a car T5 into it.

the later one piece bellhousig style tranny, with transfer case is an option, you just have to use a newer clutch master so the plastic line can be used, then swap in an 80s or 90s clutch pedal to your pedal hanger assembly.
64 F100 shorty, slammed hotrod 302 truck efi
65 M 100, gasser, blown sbc
94 monster Dodge diesel4x4
91 F350 700 hp cummins diesel
96 Sebring convertible
ICEMAN6166
Posts: 11470
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842
Poland

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by ICEMAN6166 »

anything that requires giving up the divorced gear driven transfer case is a big con in my opinion.

as to trans length if you end up with a connecting driveshaft thats basically a u joint with 2 yokes thats ok.
1966 F250 4x4
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by Greg D »

The M5R2 is a good unit - they tend to have a shifter seal problem but if you watch so it doesn't run dry you'll be fine.
The M5R2's shifter is in nearly the correct position for our trucks - T-5 is WAY off.
M5 uses a hydraulic release bearing/ slave cylinder combination. Not too difficult to convert you clutch pedal assy for a master cylinder. Line may be a trick though. If I were to run out to buy stuff I would've used the M5.
T-5 is an excellent choice - little more complicated to install.
Divorced T case isn't hard to move - driveshafts can be modded easy enough.
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
Bill W
Posts: 1166
Joined: December 26, 2007, 1:32 pm
Location: Tucson AZ.

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by Bill W »

what about the T170-FT with overdrive from a mid 80's? they came behind the SBF so it would have the same bolt pattern.
R Pope
Posts: 517
Joined: September 18, 2007, 7:53 pm
Location: sask

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by R Pope »

The thing about a SBF trans behind a 6 is the V8's use a weighted flywheel and the 6 doesn't. Your flywheel for the farmer four won't work with the 5 speed.
As far as towing goes, just leave the trans in 4th and it's the same as your 4 speed in High.
My Slick with an M5 looks stock in the cab, the shifter comes up through the same hole as the four speed did. I am toying with the idea of welding the four speed shift lever on the 5 speed stub so it looks completely stock. All the uglies will be covered up by the boot.
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by Greg D »

R Pope wrote:The thing about a SBF trans behind a 6 is the V8's use a weighted flywheel and the 6 doesn't.
Could just have the flywheel rebalanced.
Or of course get one for the 6.
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
cooter
Posts: 354
Joined: July 12, 2010, 6:45 pm
Location: Edmonton Alberta

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by cooter »

i have removed the weight on a flexplate and had no vibration problems but buying the right one is always the best choice
why put off till tommorow what you can put off alltogether
User avatar
Anthony
Posts: 1422
Joined: July 12, 2010, 4:56 am
Location: Huntington, West Virginia
United States of America

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by Anthony »

I am not trans smart but like to tinker with these ideas...
R Pope, what is the M5 trans out of and is it pretty straight forward on the swap?? I like the idea of the shifter coming through the same hole since I have an aluminum cover for the hump...

Thanks for all the ideas guys...
R Pope
Posts: 517
Joined: September 18, 2007, 7:53 pm
Location: sask

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by R Pope »

Mine came out of a '95 F100 with a 300. You should look for an earlier one with a cable drive for the speedometer, the '95 had an electric speedo drive in the rear end. I had to find an '89 or so to raid the tail stock and gears. Your 4X4 will have the cable coming out of the T-case, though, won't it? So that won't matter. The M5's were used from '88 to about '96 in pickups.
BTW, the V8 flywheel won't fit the six anyway, different bolt pattern.
The M5R2 is all synchro, even reverse! Which is weird, the reverse idler must be turning a zillion RPM at top speed in High!
For you 2WD guys an '88 LTD driveshaft works with the 5 speed, yoke and all. THE 4wd short shaft will have to be cut down, but there should be lots of room without moving the T-case. I don't remember how far back the T case is on a Slick 4X4, so I could be wrong there.
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by Greg D »

R Pope wrote:For you 2WD guys an '88 LTD driveshaft works with the 5 speed, yoke and all.
Long or short bed?
Hmm, wonder how close the length is to a T-5?
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
R Pope
Posts: 517
Joined: September 18, 2007, 7:53 pm
Location: sask

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by R Pope »

Sorry, should have said mine is a longbed. Maybe a Comet or some such will work on a shorty, I don't know. Just hit the wreckers with a tape measure in hand, like I did, I guess.
bluebolt
Posts: 841
Joined: November 18, 2007, 4:19 pm
Location: Benton LA

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by bluebolt »

The M5R2 was also used up through at least 2008 with the 4.2 V6, same bellhousing pattern as SBF/300 six..
User avatar
Greg D
Posts: 10113
Joined: September 13, 2006, 4:39 pm
Location: Podunk Iowa
United States of America

Re: pro's and con's of the newer 5 speeds behind a 300 I6

Post by Greg D »

I have a real nice aluminum driveshaft from a Ford van.
However since it costs about $200 to shorten and I will likely cut the truck down to a short bed later on I was looking for a cheap temporary alternative.
I seem to remember I have 73" from the seal to the center of the rear U Joint.
1964 F 100 - I am going to do "something" with it.......

viewtopic.php?f=32&t=15942

1987 Mustang LX Convertible, 2.3 Auto - cruiser.
1994 F 150 XLT 2WD


~ Yes - I adopted another cat..............

Cam L Milan,
You'll be missed my friend.
Post Reply