can't decide which slick to build....Help!

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

Post Reply

Given the info here, which truck would you build and which would you part?

Poll ended at June 8, 2009, 12:09 am

the 64 w/292 Y-8, straight but some rust
10
91%
the 64 w/300 I-6, solid, but beat up and plain-Jane
1
9%
 
Total votes: 11

PatriotCPO
Posts: 11
Joined: July 22, 2006, 8:59 am
Location: Kent Island, MD

can't decide which slick to build....Help!

Post by PatriotCPO »

Let's just say "a friend" has two Slicks:

a 64 Custom Cab LB with a 292 8cyl, 4 on floor.
a 65 LB with a 300 I-6, 4 on the floor

Each has some plusses and minuses

The 64 has some nice straight body panels, but it lived most of it's life in the Northeast, so it does have some rust. Some rust in lower corners of cab. Nothing that couldn't be repaired, though. Bed floor is like swiss cheese, but frame is straight and solid. Engine runs/truck drives, but I have no knowledge of engine rework history. Left bank of cylinders throws a little bit of blue smoke. Overall, even though the truck needs some help, it is still a looker. Much prettier than the truck I just bought as a parts truck.....which is a....

The 65 lived most of it's life as a San Antonio, TX area farm truck and it shows. Floor boards have some minor perforations, but the cab corners are very solid. The body panels have some surface rust, but no perforation. They are however beat to hell...big dents on virtually every corner of the truck. The truck was used as a daily driver by it's last owner until a year or so , and in fact was used to move him and his wife from WA state over here to the east coast, with a Toyota in tow....not too shabby for a 40-some year old truck! Bed floor is solid, frame is straight and solid. I-6 has a top-end rebuild in the not too distant past, and the engine compartment sports several new-ish parts like water pump, master and wheel cylinders, starter, alternator, carb.

So here's my dilemma. I bought the 65 as a parts truck, but I'm starting to think maybe the chassis and driveline from the 65 might make a better base for my keeper truck than the 64. I love the 64 however...it has a certain hot rod feel to it that the 65 is missing.

Is there a huge advantage in having the 65's Twin I-Beam front end?

I know this is gonna be a can of worms, but what are the plusses and minuses for both the 292 Y-block and the 300 I6? I do LOVE the music the 292 plays through the true duals with Cherry Bombs, however the 6 is nice and smooth, and runs strong (along with legendary reliability....) I know the 292 isn't a real powerhouse among 8's, but it at least SOUNDS fast!

All opinions/thoughts are welcome!!

Mark
User avatar
Alan Mclennan
Posts: 9324
Joined: October 14, 2006, 6:16 pm
Location: In the shed... Cranebrook NSW
Australia

Post by Alan Mclennan »

8) Mark, you aren't going to like my answer but here goes!, build both! you know you want too!. :lol:
Honey, If I say I`ll fix something I will, there`s no need to remind me every 6 months!!
66 f100 tabletop swb 351 Clevo C6 "Beryl"

Slick Stock 3 KCMO
Slick Stock 4 Altoona
Slick Stock 5 KCMO
Slick Stock 6 Altoona
Slick Stock 7 Salina KS
Slick Stock 8.............................. cry.gif
36truck
Posts: 3152
Joined: October 20, 2007, 8:32 pm
Location: Land of Sunshine AZ
United States of America

Post by 36truck »

X2 build both. Only you can decide what way to go either one will make a good truck.
Tom Williams
ridgerunner
Posts: 26
Joined: March 25, 2009, 12:16 pm
Location: livonia, Mo.

poll

Post by ridgerunner »

i agree with Alan. build both, they sell repair panels
User avatar
65f100_Thug
Posts: 612
Joined: October 13, 2008, 9:09 pm
Location: Arkansas
United States of America

Post by 65f100_Thug »

If you can, build both. but if I had to choose I would pick the 64 building a 65 bondo buggy was fun for me as a kid ,but now i Look for straighter metal to work with. Plus I think the twin I beam is over rated don't get me wrong probably the toughest suspension built and great for a work truck but as a hotrod they just miss the handling and ride a guy comes to expect,especially after driving newer stuff most of the time. well thats my 2 cents. :2cents:
HAVE YOU DISASSEMBLED A FORD LATELY?

10136 98349929981298119816
User avatar
1961 slickwilly
Posts: 272
Joined: March 4, 2009, 8:13 pm
Location: alabama
Contact:

Post by 1961 slickwilly »

build the 64 then use the 65 as its been used for most of its life a work truck use it as a work truck, a parts hauler, trailer pulling machine. then pull your 64 around with to the show and tell every one that you have two trucks to show the actual before and after instead of pictures. you have to love that feeling of going to the parts yard to get slick parts and not having to worry about scratching your paint or puting more character building dents in it lol
Anthony

Post by Anthony »

I've got to agree, build the '64 and continue to drive the '65 as your daily driver. when done with the '64, then go to driving it daily and rebuild the '65. See how simple... :mrgreen: luck.gif .... good luck either way and keep us up to date on the decision and the build.... Anthony
User avatar
1966 Ford
Posts: 55
Joined: January 15, 2007, 5:33 pm
Location: oregon

Post by 1966 Ford »

I agree I would build both
1966 Custom Cab
1967 Fairlane Ranchero
User avatar
dotcentral
Posts: 1341
Joined: August 18, 2006, 5:13 pm
Location: Charlotte, NC

Post by dotcentral »

I voted for the 64.

Use the 65 for parts, putting the best parts on your 64 but keeping the 65 running. When finished with the 64, you can either sell the 65 or build it up.
Driver: 71 F100 Shortbed: Disc swap, 5.0 HO EFI & AOD
Project Vehicle/Mild Custom: 66 F100 CC longbed: Sold
PatriotCPO
Posts: 11
Joined: July 22, 2006, 8:59 am
Location: Kent Island, MD

Post by PatriotCPO »

Everybody,

Thanks for the input....I think the majority opinion sort of goes along with my gut feeling...the 64 has more hot rod appeal, and that's where I think I'll focus my efforts first. Keeping the 65 as a work truck took on some new significance today, since we ended up having to remove a dead tree from our property. Every time my son let a tree branch scrape the side of the bed, I thought how lucky I was to not be doing this with a pretty new paint job. Keeping the 65 as a workhorse sounds like a good idea after several runs to the dump!

Here's a link to a photo of the 65.... Patina-a-go-go!

http://fordtruk.com/forums/album_showpa ... ic_id=5721
36truck
Posts: 3152
Joined: October 20, 2007, 8:32 pm
Location: Land of Sunshine AZ
United States of America

Post by 36truck »

That's a perfect work truck the wheels give it that hot rat rod look. :lol:
Tom Williams
User avatar
ezernut9mm
Posts: 9141
Joined: July 21, 2006, 9:37 pm
Location: KCMO
Sweden

Post by ezernut9mm »

yep. build the 64 and work that 65.
always
"i believe i've achieved satisfaction".-bubbles
"should i be gettin" baked for this boys?"-bubbles


i could no longer keep "r.i.p.ing" all of our fallen brothers and sisters, so i say here, slick loads of love and much respect to all you beautiful people.
Anthony

Post by Anthony »

looks to me like someone has used the '65 as a truck?!?! :hm: Oh yea, I guess that is what it is. Looks to be solid but dinged and dented. thats what a truck is. looks like a killer daily driver to me Patriot. got to love the side tool box. been looking for one myself. just haven't found one at a price I can afford.(free or cheap) keep us posted on the '64 build..... Anthony
User avatar
Gary Seymour
Posts: 1192
Joined: September 15, 2006, 5:17 am
Location: Brown County, Indiana
United States of America

Post by Gary Seymour »

Yep. That '65 is a great daily driver truck. Keep it going and use it.
Post Reply