Which Motor???

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

blackagatha
Posts: 2582
Joined: March 10, 2007, 12:49 am
Location: Arizona

Post by blackagatha »

I love my 390 in my '63. I can never get a decent mpg calculated though, because all the freeway time I get always hits rush hour in Phoenix and idles for 50 miles, and screws up the numbers. The last time I calculated from one of those trips, I got anout 7.
7?!? crap... I hope it really gets better than that!!!

Skip..... What setup do you have to get 15? that's incredible.
'63 with 390 & lots of juice. But never enough. Always want more.
ImageImageImage
shawns fords
Posts: 1111
Joined: March 31, 2007, 11:34 am
Location: Foxfield Colorado
Contact:

Post by shawns fords »

why dont you guys step the primaries down a notch and up the secondaries?
User avatar
66fordtrucknut
Posts: 1289
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:48 pm
Location: Eastern Shore - MD

Post by 66fordtrucknut »

When we went to Knoxville last Wayne K. got 21 mpg with his 240 and 3.0 gears, with my 223 with 3.70 gears got 17.
Charlie
62' SWB uni 223
66' F-100 Short/wide 352
78' F-350 dually dumpbed 400
12' F-150 5.0 3:73 LS
User avatar
Johnny Canuck
Posts: 8291
Joined: April 9, 2006, 11:14 pm
Location: Edmonton, Alberta.
Canada

Post by Johnny Canuck »

The 351w in my shorty gets 15 Imperial MPG on a good day. An imperial gallon is 20% larger than a US one, so that's roughly 12.5 US MPG.

I am currently trying to improve this by installing a 4 BBl that has smaller primarys that the current 2BBl carb. Keeping my foot out of it will be easy, I will simply have to say to my Scottish brain.. there went $10!

The 302 in my '78 F100 LWB got an honest and consistent 20 MPG, with a C4 automatic and stock single exhaust.
It's a race.. Will hell freeze over or will JC finish his truck first. Stay tuned..
User avatar
The Big M
Posts: 1360
Joined: August 9, 2006, 3:03 pm
Location: Rocky View County, AB
Canada

Post by The Big M »

I have an old, tired, 216,000-mile 5.0 with EFI, backed by an AOD. It's in an '87 Grand Marquis, and it just turned out 26 imperial miles-per-gallon (22 US mpg) on a 6-hour trip last weekend. That was at about 70 mph too. It blew out 1-1/2 quarts of oil in the process, but all in all not too bad.

Of course a Slick experiences greater aerodynamic drag, which makes a significant difference, but I'd say there's decent potential with a fuel-injected 5.0.
User avatar
Wylie
Posts: 24
Joined: July 29, 2006, 11:06 am
Location: N. Kentucky

Post by Wylie »

All very convincing arguements. And just like my question about the shocks a couple weeks ago, I'm even more confused now :?
shawns fords
Posts: 1111
Joined: March 31, 2007, 11:34 am
Location: Foxfield Colorado
Contact:

Post by shawns fords »

grumpy is my old work truck he has worn out leaf sprngs and coils hes a 1978 F150 short bed 4x4 dad bought it new and its well over 500k now we had a 351m in it and about 6 years ago it got a fresh 400m actually its a 406 if ya want to get technical, truck hasnt ever failed emissions and still the original 2bbl carb on it I get average 12 mpg city use hauling heavy loads from tearing out carpet and tile in houses to the dump ( which is what he does for a living) my 06 f 150 xlt isnt much better getting around 15 and its a good 1000 -1500 lbs heavier being a super crew with 6 1/2 foot bed. I honestly think the mileage out of grumpy is due to better tourque from having the 2bbl, I know it could be improved with 4bbl with smaller secondaries and also know id be driving around with my foot all the way down too :lol:
Post Reply