brandon66f100 wrote:Toyz wrote:Not trying to pass judgement here; the service may be the best thing since radial tires, but anyone interested might do well to perform a Google search on MCA.
The main sales contention seems to be "more value than AAA"; in my experience that might well ring true (that's not a high bar, IMHO), but at considerably more premium? I'd also want to know the breakdown as to what percentage of the "dues" goes where. From a quick "read", I'm not certain that this company would even be around if and when service might be needed.
Just my unsolicited opinion, especially since it appears from your statements that you have much more eexperience involving road service needs!
Have you actually had reason to use the services of this outfit you are touting?
Paul
I have used them, and never had a problem....I could google any roadside assistance program and find a bunch of disgruntled people, you cant satisfy everyone. and as far as the price is concerned, the dues can be written off on your taxes at the end of the year. Next time you get a moving violation, call your roadside assistance and see if they will pay for the lawyer to fight it lol.
Ok, you state that two months ago you were using another provider, and you say you HAVE used MCA, so I would assume it was in the last 2 months. If you have in fact used Geico, USAA and AAA, and others in a recent period, you MIGHT want to consider putting your money into a more effective maintenance plan

I somehow missed the actual description of your roadside experience with MCA??? I also can't seem to find any info on the various websites indicating that the "dues" are tax deductible for an individual. Is your $80.00 "commision" also tax deductible?
On visiting the MCA website; (not your link) I DO see top-of-website advertising for their "referral" system, which seems somewhat unusual

I also see coverage disclaimers and limitations through-out the "service" descriptions.Pretty well standard for the industry, but, No felony violations; OK, that just limited the usefulness of the "bail bond". Traffic ticket representation; naw, I'd rather avoid a ticket compared to spending repeated trips to the courthouse on the premise that an unknown attorney may be able to get me off the charge, or reduce the costs!
The lack of BBB endorsement could also be a warning flag; if the service is as great as expected, a BBB membership might prove to be a good marketing tool.
It looks to me as if this could be one of those "programs" where the "early adopters" get rich as the expense of later "members" as the marketing reaches a saturation point. If everyone becomes an "associate", then who is left to buy the expensive memberships and provide the $ 80.00 "commisions" ?, which, by the way, appear to require a full year of prior "membership" before a reduced percentage of "commisions" become payable.
Again, I'm extremely happy with the multiple alternatives I have available at a much lower cost; my total cost of full coverage automobile insurance , including liability, and a realistic 250 mile towing and roadside assistance covering ALL vehicles, is just barely more on a per vehicle basis than the MCA "Platinum" service.
If someone here is interested in your offering, more power to them! As noted, I would strongly suggest they fully investigate before commiting.
I am certainly not knocking AAA and other providers, their service may be somewhat slow IMO, but at least you get the feeling they may be around when needed. I am aware MCA has been around for a long time,; my concern would be whether they remain around as this marketing scheme plays out. Their pricing for memberships also seems more realistic. My discomfort with AAA was along the same lines as those expressed by Brian and Tom; their contracts with towing providers leave much to be desired (like profitability), unless you are trying to enhance volume at a repair facility.
FWIW,
Paul