Page 1 of 1
NOT a 63 continental
Posted: November 17, 2009, 11:40 am
by Johnny Canuck
Instead of those other converts which were depressing me and making me think of this
How about this beauty. Man they are as nice or nicer than they ever have been
Posted: November 17, 2009, 12:04 pm
by gearhead21
I just got a new 10 Mustang GT coupe. Of the 8 Mustangs I have had since 66, this is the best. It is even quieter, handles better, and quicker than the 05 I had. The way they changed the dash makes it much nicer.
Posted: November 17, 2009, 12:14 pm
by Brian Taylor
I like the headlight brow giving the car a angry look. I agree that the 2010 is better eye candy than before. Suttle chages make it sweet and I would love to have one. But I am an old Mopar guy and want a new Challenger too.
Posted: November 17, 2009, 2:13 pm
by Hoofbeat Racer
I like the sequentials on the 10s. Wish they still made cougars
Posted: November 17, 2009, 2:39 pm
by Johnny Canuck
Mark they were almost called cougars
http://mustangs.about.com/od/faq/f/faq_name.htm
read the bottom
Posted: November 17, 2009, 9:22 pm
by ezernut9mm
i like that they brought back grabber blue or whatever it's called.
Posted: November 17, 2009, 9:40 pm
by Max
That looks metallic though. What a nice stance.
Posted: November 17, 2009, 9:59 pm
by Greg D
I like the Grabber Blue, like the sequential tail lights.
Other than that I like the 05 better - you can get a sequential tail light kit for them too.
I'll take another one just like this thank you - I'll add Le Mans stripes in charcoal this time though.
[albumimg]6019[/albumimg]
Posted: November 19, 2009, 6:44 am
by cavinandpavin
if you do read the bottom of that page it says they almost called the mustang the t-5... they actually did call them t-5 i have worked on one. it was a 66 or 67 and it was a mustang but didnt say mustang anywhere on it. instead of mustang emblems it had a big t with a 5 laid over it and if i remember right it has a crown or sumthin made into the emblem, they told my to be extra careful with the emblems, i guess you cant getem at all, period.
oh and for those wondering it was a car built for the german(? i think)market and they already had a bike with the mustang name so instead of buying it out they renamed it... if i remember all thins right.
Posted: November 19, 2009, 8:35 am
by ezernut9mm
cavinandpavin wrote:
if you do read the bottom of that page it says they almost called the mustang the t-5... they actually did call them t-5 i have worked on one. it was a 66 or 67 and it was a mustang but didnt say mustang anywhere on it. instead of mustang emblems it had a big t with a 5 laid over it and if i remember right it has a crown or sumthin made into the emblem, they told my to be extra careful with the emblems, i guess you cant getem at all, period.
oh and for those wondering it was a car built for the german(? i think)market and they already had a bike with the mustang name so instead of buying it out they renamed it... if i remember all thins right.
http://www.mustangmonthly.com/featuredv ... index.html
Posted: November 19, 2009, 3:13 pm
by Greg D
If I remember right those were made clear up to 69-70 or so.
Posted: November 19, 2009, 3:42 pm
by Gritsngumbo
ezernut9mm wrote:cavinandpavin wrote:
if you do read the bottom of that page it says they almost called the mustang the t-5... they actually did call them t-5 i have worked on one. it was a 66 or 67 and it was a mustang but didnt say mustang anywhere on it. instead of mustang emblems it had a big t with a 5 laid over it and if i remember right it has a crown or sumthin made into the emblem, they told my to be extra careful with the emblems, i guess you cant getem at all, period.
oh and for those wondering it was a car built for the german(? i think)market and they already had a bike with the mustang name so instead of buying it out they renamed it... if i remember all thins right.
http://www.mustangmonthly.com/featuredv ... index.html
Thanks for sharing this bit of Mustang (oops T-5) history.