2 OR 4?
Posted: February 21, 2007, 2:17 pm
Is it just me or not that thinks quad headlight trucks look wrong. .
Page 1 of 3
Posted: February 21, 2007, 2:41 pm
Posted: February 21, 2007, 3:09 pm
far as i know just you two. 
wheres Tim, im probably going to need reinforcements on this.
wheres Tim, im probably going to need reinforcements on this.
Posted: February 21, 2007, 3:41 pm
Notice the resemblance??
Posted: February 21, 2007, 4:08 pm
The signature Ford F-100 Edith Bunker. Predecessor to the Eddie Baur.
Posted: February 22, 2007, 6:20 am
make it 3.
Charlie
Charlie
Posted: February 22, 2007, 10:09 am
I'll admit I do like 2 headlights better, even with 4 eyes fridges still are cool. I like the Eddie Bauer package on the mid 90s F150s the not "overdone" 2 tone on them looks good.
Re: 2 OR 4?
Posted: February 22, 2007, 10:21 am
bawrencher wrote:Is it just me or not that thinks quad headlight trucks look wrong. .
It's just you guys
Posted: February 22, 2007, 10:59 am
another vote against having 4.
Posted: February 22, 2007, 11:39 am
ELpolacko's truck sure looks right to me. Comet's is going to look great too...
I don't see why quad headlights are acceptable on a car but not a truck.
I don't see why quad headlights are acceptable on a car but not a truck.
Posted: February 22, 2007, 12:21 pm
Mean like this?The Big M wrote:I don't see why quad headlights are acceptable on a car but not a truck.
reminds me of this
Posted: February 22, 2007, 12:34 pm
stacked duals make you feel any better?
i would take them either way.
even on the edsel. i almost bought one a few years ago.
first car i ever drove was one of these.
i would take them either way.
even on the edsel. i almost bought one a few years ago.
first car i ever drove was one of these.
Posted: February 22, 2007, 12:35 pm
Im with brian on this one, 4 is the only way to go, cant beet 4 headlights shinning in someones eyes when they cut you off. 
donno what you guys are thinking, although now that i think about it the 57's were pretty nice looking too 
LOL
Tim - my votes for 4 eyes
donno what you guys are thinking, although now that i think about it the 57's were pretty nice looking too LOLTim - my votes for 4 eyes
Posted: February 22, 2007, 1:06 pm
I too like Edsels, they are like that ugly dog you just can help but like. Guess I should have used this
as the bad example
as the bad examplePosted: February 22, 2007, 1:11 pm
that buick is an angry looking car.
still better looking than any of todays new cars.
still better looking than any of todays new cars.
Posted: February 22, 2007, 1:18 pm
Nope.ICEMAN6166 wrote:still better looking than any of todays new cars.
The proposed '08 Bullitt.
I want one so bad you can hear me drooling from there.
Posted: February 22, 2007, 2:18 pm
I wondered what that dripping sound was...I thought I left the faucet on again.Johnny Canuck wrote:
I want one so bad you can hear me drooling from there.
Posted: February 22, 2007, 3:01 pm
some cars look ok with four headlights. but trucks look ugly with four headlights. at least the old one do.
Posted: February 22, 2007, 3:16 pm
And some cars look good with NO headlights.Fordman wrote:some cars look ok with four headlights.
Posted: February 22, 2007, 3:58 pm
I think "ugly" has more to do with the overall lines and flow of a vehicle, not the number of headlights. If anything, the Edsel would look more odd with single headlights. Same goes for the Buick.
How many trucks had quad headlights from the factory anyway? Apart from 58-60 Fords, of course. 80's GMC's? What else? I'm curious as to which particular model set off this little rant...
How many trucks had quad headlights from the factory anyway? Apart from 58-60 Fords, of course. 80's GMC's? What else? I'm curious as to which particular model set off this little rant...