My experience with AIM drop beams

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

Post Reply
dsrtjeeper
Posts: 136
Joined: September 15, 2010, 9:07 pm
United States of America

My experience with AIM drop beams

Post by dsrtjeeper »

Please follow the story and photos here:

http://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/12811 ... -luck.html
1966 F100 LWB
Balanced 390 .060 over, Comp 270s, Performer RPM intake, Quick Fuel 680VS carb, full length headers, gasket matched/fully ported C6AE-R heads, 2-1/2" duals, C6 and 3:54 gears with Tracloc.
User avatar
slixtyfive
Posts: 458
Joined: January 19, 2007, 2:03 pm
Location: Eastern Iowa
United States of America

Re: My experience with AIM drop beams

Post by slixtyfive »

The front to rear wheel placement should primarily be affected by the radius arms. I don't understand why the radius arms off your truck aren't the same length - I've never noticed that on any of several twin Ibeam trucks I've dis-mantled........

I also don't understand all the comments about the two beams(left and right) having the same curvature when placed side by side. That is correct - place the stock beams side by side and you will see the same similarities between left and right beams. The difference is in the king pin angle.

Sorry to hear about all your problems - sure seems they would have his figured out by now and I also don't understand why older versions of the AIM beams others have used seem to be OK.......
"It's better to be gone but not forgotten, than to be forgotten but not gone." Gary Allan
User avatar
Rusty 63
Posts: 602
Joined: November 13, 2009, 8:04 pm
Location: Florida
Contact:
United States of America

Re: My experience with AIM drop beams

Post by Rusty 63 »

I seem to recall reading that the radius arm length did vary by year or truck size (100/250/etc)-- maybe someone replaced one but not another?
dsrtjeeper
Posts: 136
Joined: September 15, 2010, 9:07 pm
United States of America

Re: My experience with AIM drop beams

Post by dsrtjeeper »

slixtyfive wrote:The front to rear wheel placement should primarily be affected by the radius arms. I don't understand why the radius arms off your truck aren't the same length - I've never noticed that on any of several twin Ibeam trucks I've dis-mantled........

I also don't understand all the comments about the two beams(left and right) having the same curvature when placed side by side. That is correct - place the stock beams side by side and you will see the same similarities between left and right beams. The difference is in the king pin angle.

Sorry to hear about all your problems - sure seems they would have his figured out by now and I also don't understand why older versions of the AIM beams others have used seem to be OK.......
The radius arms are the same length on my truck. I reinstalled my stock beams and everything is perfect now.
1966 F100 LWB
Balanced 390 .060 over, Comp 270s, Performer RPM intake, Quick Fuel 680VS carb, full length headers, gasket matched/fully ported C6AE-R heads, 2-1/2" duals, C6 and 3:54 gears with Tracloc.
dsrtjeeper
Posts: 136
Joined: September 15, 2010, 9:07 pm
United States of America

Re: My experience with AIM drop beams

Post by dsrtjeeper »

Rusty 63 wrote:I seem to recall reading that the radius arm length did vary by year or truck size (100/250/etc)-- maybe someone replaced one but not another?
Stock radius arms and same length. Did I misword something? Sorry if I did.
1966 F100 LWB
Balanced 390 .060 over, Comp 270s, Performer RPM intake, Quick Fuel 680VS carb, full length headers, gasket matched/fully ported C6AE-R heads, 2-1/2" duals, C6 and 3:54 gears with Tracloc.
User avatar
slixtyfive
Posts: 458
Joined: January 19, 2007, 2:03 pm
Location: Eastern Iowa
United States of America

Re: My experience with AIM drop beams

Post by slixtyfive »

I must have mis-understood or maybe someone else on the FTE thread indicated theirs were different length one side to the other...

Sorry for the confusion.
"It's better to be gone but not forgotten, than to be forgotten but not gone." Gary Allan
Post Reply