I recently aquired a good used 4R70W. I am planning on using it in the unibody build. It's from a 2001 4.2L F150. I'm going to be putting it behind a 375-400 hp 351W.
My questions are:
The torque converter that came with it has the orange paint code and I've been told that means it has a "165K stall factor"....what does that mean?
I've also been told that the converters are only good to about 5400 rpm before ballooning. Is that true?
Has anyone has any experience with the TransGo AODE-3 (manual function) kit? I'm debating manual operation versus an aftermarket controller.
If I did go with the manual kit I'll still need to wire up OD and TCC, correct?
Thanks for the help!
Anyone running an AODE/4R70W?
I've got a TCI Constant Pressure Val Body in AOD
In a 65F100 behind 5.0, the valve body shifting is too dang harsh even in the down shifting, I would NOT recommend to anyone. IF the transmission which has some age lasts to the spring I'm removing the TCI valve body
Griffin GA 1965 F100
Have 3, one daily driver others in different state of repair/disrepair
Have 3, one daily driver others in different state of repair/disrepair
I am running a 4R70W but my Uni is fully wired with the EEC-V and controls for the trans. Works good but don't know the specs.
This company seems pretty up on this trans
http://www.becontrols.com/
This company seems pretty up on this trans
http://www.becontrols.com/
INEPTOCRACY: (in-ep'-toc-ra-cy) : a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.
-
Thunderboy
- Posts: 335
- Joined: August 26, 2008, 2:24 pm
- Location: Sacramento, California
It could be made to work, as long as it fits. I know 4.6 and 5.4L engines' trannys have a longer input shaft, and maybe a different bellhousing pattern? Not sure about the 4.2L. I would check case fitment first.
There is no real optimum AOD for a 351W, but I understand the easiest to swap is one behind a Mustang 5.0, but if your engine is that powerful, it will need some beefing up/updating to work with that combo ($$$).
There is no real optimum AOD for a 351W, but I understand the easiest to swap is one behind a Mustang 5.0, but if your engine is that powerful, it will need some beefing up/updating to work with that combo ($$$).
Drew
66 F250 Frame swap, EFI 408W, ZF 5-speed swap (still!) in progress
63 Falcon Futura EFI 331W, T5, but not much progress... Slicks First!!!
66 F250 Frame swap, EFI 408W, ZF 5-speed swap (still!) in progress
63 Falcon Futura EFI 331W, T5, but not much progress... Slicks First!!!
4R70
The 4.2L is the Essex V6 and has the small block Ford pattern, it will bolt up fine with the right flexplate.Thunderboy wrote:It could be made to work, as long as it fits. I know 4.6 and 5.4L engines' trannys have a longer input shaft, and maybe a different bellhousing pattern? Not sure about the 4.2L. I would check case fitment first.
There is no real optimum AOD for a 351W, but I understand the easiest to swap is one behind a Mustang 5.0, but if your engine is that powerful, it will need some beefing up/updating to work with that combo ($$$).
Thanks for the info guys. I already did a bit of research before I picked up this tranny. I knew the 3.8 and 4.2 engines share the SBF bolt pattern.
Everyone I talk to also tells me that the 4r70w is stout even in stock trim so I'm not concerned about that. I'm just trying to decide if I want to bypass the electronics and make it a manual shift trans or if i want to go through with the trouble of an aftermarket controller.
Everyone I talk to also tells me that the 4r70w is stout even in stock trim so I'm not concerned about that. I'm just trying to decide if I want to bypass the electronics and make it a manual shift trans or if i want to go through with the trouble of an aftermarket controller.
I found some good torque converter info HERE
It says that 165K represents 165 times K where K is the square root of torque. So for some easy math lets say your making 400ft-lbs of torque. That would equate to 165x20=3300rpm. Now I don't know how well it scales for high torque nonstock motors, so 400ft-lbs might not = 3300 rpm of stall.
It says that 165K represents 165 times K where K is the square root of torque. So for some easy math lets say your making 400ft-lbs of torque. That would equate to 165x20=3300rpm. Now I don't know how well it scales for high torque nonstock motors, so 400ft-lbs might not = 3300 rpm of stall.
SBC is a defunct phone company, not an engine option.
