New Rear axle question?

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

Post Reply
User avatar
Choppermike
Posts: 51
Joined: March 8, 2007, 3:06 pm
Location: Perryville, AR
Contact:

New Rear axle question?

Post by Choppermike »

Ok I scored a 93 explorer 3:73 8.8" posi/LS rear end for $100 bucks. I shaved the pads got some new ones and stuck it in. Looks good and now I have the same bolt pattern as my Aero front end. Just by looking at facts and figures, My 62 Uni has a 61" wide axle and the explorer is about 59.5" give or take.

Now my question is wheels? Backspacing? I put on a couple of Ranger rims I had which are a common 3.5 backspace and they are close, very close to the wheel well. Has anyone had a similar problem or can someone tell me if I should get a wider rear? I just don't want to cut my wells unless its a last resort.
Mike
1962 F100 Unibody- Ol' Jack
65 Mustang Coupe
92 Mustang LX
2006 Mustang

[albumimg]3443[/albumimg]
User avatar
Jarrod
Posts: 361
Joined: July 17, 2006, 3:11 pm
Location: California

Post by Jarrod »

the 8.8 is a common swap in jeeps since the track width is close but the 8.8 is about 1.5 inches narrower. THe cheap and easy thing to do is if the front is going to be wider than the rear is to get hub spacers. I know that it is not the ideal solution but a company called spidertrax makes them out of billit aluminum and the are a great product. I ran some on a jeep xj I had with an 8.8 on the rear. I ran 35 inch tires and didn't even know they were there. The 8.8 was 1.5 inches narrower than the dana 30 in the front so I got the 3/4 inch one on each side. not enough to make a difference.
Cheers,
Jarrod
User avatar
Choppermike
Posts: 51
Joined: March 8, 2007, 3:06 pm
Location: Perryville, AR
Contact:

Post by Choppermike »

Has anyone here used an 8.8 in a slick?
1962 F100 Unibody- Ol' Jack
65 Mustang Coupe
92 Mustang LX
2006 Mustang

[albumimg]3443[/albumimg]
User avatar
JFCDeuce
Posts: 283
Joined: June 2, 2007, 9:53 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

8.8

Post by JFCDeuce »

I may do it soon, I've got a potential Mustang rear with a posi.. (I think its got a 4.11) it would be ideal in my truck... havn't looked into all the bugs yet though...
"Let the Devil have his Chevy, thank God Jesus loves His Fords." -Angry Johnny and the Killbillies 'Creepy Pete'
User avatar
6166 Junkyard Dog
Posts: 3502
Joined: July 23, 2006, 9:34 am
Location: Reidsville, N.C.
Contact:
United States of America

Post by 6166 Junkyard Dog »

in reality Fords 9" is the better way to go but hard to do with the small bolt pattern unless redrilling the axles is a option
Tom,
@
Lazy FORD Ranch
Where Ford Trucks Rest in Peace

Dakota,,, RIP will never be the same looking for 61-66 trucks again ,, :cry: Kathy :cry:
Slickstock,,, York, PA
Slickstock,,, Kansas City, MO
Slickstock,,, Altoona, IOWA
Slickstock,,, Salina, KS

Now Cooper will try his best :lol: :lol:

12649

Cooper now has 2018 Slick Stock,, give him a fair star :lol:
Slickstock Kansas City, Mo
User avatar
Johnny Canuck
Posts: 8291
Joined: April 9, 2006, 11:14 pm
Location: Edmonton, Alberta.
Canada

Post by Johnny Canuck »

My Old uni had an 8.8. no problems behind a 351w at all. I believe it was from an LTD
It's a race.. Will hell freeze over or will JC finish his truck first. Stay tuned..
User avatar
6166 Junkyard Dog
Posts: 3502
Joined: July 23, 2006, 9:34 am
Location: Reidsville, N.C.
Contact:
United States of America

Post by 6166 Junkyard Dog »

yes it will work as long as drive it with some sense hot rod a little but not hard like the place is on fire
Tom,
@
Lazy FORD Ranch
Where Ford Trucks Rest in Peace

Dakota,,, RIP will never be the same looking for 61-66 trucks again ,, :cry: Kathy :cry:
Slickstock,,, York, PA
Slickstock,,, Kansas City, MO
Slickstock,,, Altoona, IOWA
Slickstock,,, Salina, KS

Now Cooper will try his best :lol: :lol:

12649

Cooper now has 2018 Slick Stock,, give him a fair star :lol:
Slickstock Kansas City, Mo
User avatar
Jarrod
Posts: 361
Joined: July 17, 2006, 3:11 pm
Location: California

Post by Jarrod »

Those little 8.8's are stronger than you think. I have seen them survive at the rear end of a 10 second mustang. THere is plenty of after market support. They are a C clip axle, so you need to be carefull there but they are stronger than a dana 44. THey hold up real well to the torque generated in a rock crawler as well with the gear multiplcation and being wedged in a rock. Everything will break if you try hard enough. Its never going to be as strong as a 9 inch
Cheers,
Jarrod
User avatar
Fanatic
Posts: 1568
Joined: July 14, 2006, 11:39 pm
Location: Leesport, PA

Post by Fanatic »

Mike, if you already have the wheels you want then spacers would work fine . Measure where you want the wheels to be and you can get many different thicknesses.

WORD OF CAUTION The ideal setup is to have 1/2" of stud coming thru the wheel for proper torque on lugs. You may need to install longer studs in order to meet this.

If you are going to buy new wheels ---then they can be bought with many diff back spacings

Tim
INEPTOCRACY: (in-ep'-toc-ra-cy) : a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.
User avatar
Choppermike
Posts: 51
Joined: March 8, 2007, 3:06 pm
Location: Perryville, AR
Contact:

Post by Choppermike »

Thanks for the inf guys. If anyone was curious about an explorer 8.8, in my research I found that all Explorers are posi and 31- spline. I have no worries at all how it will hold up.
Thanks again.
Mike
1962 F100 Unibody- Ol' Jack
65 Mustang Coupe
92 Mustang LX
2006 Mustang

[albumimg]3443[/albumimg]
User avatar
6166 Junkyard Dog
Posts: 3502
Joined: July 23, 2006, 9:34 am
Location: Reidsville, N.C.
Contact:
United States of America

Post by 6166 Junkyard Dog »

hey chopper couple of weeks ago at one of insurance austions I go to met a guy there that he uses the explorer/expeditions to build the 48-52 trucks takes all the sheet metal off the frame then makes some brackets for the cab/front end, then cuts the frame of the explorer/expeditions off slides the original back half into the newer frame welds it up, then installs the later rear end on it and then there is all of his mounting brackets for the bed already there now that I think is pretty slick?
Tom,
@
Lazy FORD Ranch
Where Ford Trucks Rest in Peace

Dakota,,, RIP will never be the same looking for 61-66 trucks again ,, :cry: Kathy :cry:
Slickstock,,, York, PA
Slickstock,,, Kansas City, MO
Slickstock,,, Altoona, IOWA
Slickstock,,, Salina, KS

Now Cooper will try his best :lol: :lol:

12649

Cooper now has 2018 Slick Stock,, give him a fair star :lol:
Slickstock Kansas City, Mo
User avatar
Choppermike
Posts: 51
Joined: March 8, 2007, 3:06 pm
Location: Perryville, AR
Contact:

Post by Choppermike »

Like to see some pics of that!
1962 F100 Unibody- Ol' Jack
65 Mustang Coupe
92 Mustang LX
2006 Mustang

[albumimg]3443[/albumimg]
Post Reply