trannsmison help
trannsmison help
Ok heres how it goes I put an (SROD)mustang trans in my 65 f100 300I6 I kept the factory bell and fly wheel upgraded to a new diaphram clutch kit every thing went in perfect . My crapy old starter seemed to give up when i was finished i thought . I pulled it back out after only 35miles because the throughout bearing seemed to short couldn't get the clutch to release enough that is with it adjusted perfectly . The pilot bushing was chewed up and so was the splines on the trans and bearing retainer pushes against the clutch hub . It is to deep in the bell . what could be the problem and yes the block spacer is in . the t5 will fit and haven't read any issues with that . Any one that has Ideas would help .
-
BackyardRest
Re: trannsmison help
sounds like the trans input is too long for application. Did you use a pilot bushing or a brg.BMorrison wrote:Ok heres how it goes I put an (SROD)mustang trans in my 65 f100 300I6 I kept the factory bell and fly wheel upgraded to a new diaphram clutch kit every thing went in perfect . My crapy old starter seemed to give up when i was finished i thought . I pulled it back out after only 35miles because the throughout bearing seemed to short couldn't get the clutch to release enough that is with it adjusted perfectly . The pilot bushing was chewed up and so was the splines on the trans and bearing retainer pushes against the clutch hub . It is to deep in the bell . what could be the problem and yes the block spacer is in . the t5 will fit and haven't read any issues with that . Any one that has Ideas would help .
time to get out the tape measure to check length of input vs how far out your pilot bushing/crank is. was the trans tight against the block and did it seem to bind?
-
fmartin_gila
- Posts: 1021
- Joined: April 21, 2007, 9:58 am
- Location: Mandurriao, Iloilo City, Philippines
I don't remember the specifics, but there was some difference in the depth of the bellhousings between car use and truck use. amounted to 1/2 or 5/8 difference. Maybe someone else will chime in with better info. Better check the tranny input shaft bearing for damage too. Also if you ran it that way for a bit, it would have put an excessive load on the thrust bearing for the crankshaft. Better do some serious checking for damage.
Fred
Fred
http://www.davidkeetoploaders.com/bellh ... dchart.htm
From David Kee's website
"Bellhousings that will be used with a Toploader must measure 6 1/4" deep. If it measures 6 3/4" deep it is a truck bellhousing and should not be used."
I ran into this issue when I put a toploader in my 66. I had to find a car bellhousing.
From David Kee's website
"Bellhousings that will be used with a Toploader must measure 6 1/4" deep. If it measures 6 3/4" deep it is a truck bellhousing and should not be used."
I ran into this issue when I put a toploader in my 66. I had to find a car bellhousing.
1966 F100 SWB 390/Toploader/Ford traction Loc
1997 F250HD 460 4X4
2004 RoadKing
1984 FLHS
1978FXE
1997 F250HD 460 4X4
2004 RoadKing
1984 FLHS
1978FXE
The bellhousing depth difference was for FE engines and does not apply to 6 cylinder or small block applications. The truck FE used a longer bellhousing and so used the same trans for a 6 cylinder, smallblock, or FE while cars used different trans for all three (usually). In this case the front bearing support is rubbing so I would wonder if it were not a 4 cylinder or V6 trans instead of a V8 as they were slightly longer. The 302 trans should work fine behind the truck 6 but maybe there was a change I am not aware of. Hawkrod

