equalizer bar (z-bar) problem

The place to talk Slicks. All we ask is that discussion has something to do with slicks...

Moderators: Casey 65, Kid

Post Reply
User avatar
cosmo
Posts: 157
Joined: November 20, 2007, 9:00 am

equalizer bar (z-bar) problem

Post by cosmo »

I changed my 300 out for a 351 and am keeping the manual transmission.
everything "fits" but the Z-bar is now higher at the engine bushing than at the frame bushing. According to the FORD truck manual, the bushing mount at the frame is the SAME for 300s and 302s (in 1969). Hoever there was a different engine side bushing mount for the 360/390.
It seems like I can raise the frame bushing mount about an inch to make the z-bar work, but I dont know if this is the proper thing to do.
Does anyone have any experience with this issue?
thanks
Cosmo
User avatar
Uncle Skip
Posts: 4695
Joined: July 15, 2006, 8:30 pm
Location: Pearland, Texas
United States of America

Post by Uncle Skip »

Personally, that's what I'd try.
Put a spacer under the frame piece.
U@ss
I'm not arguing with you. I'm just explaining why I'm right.
Pardon me. Does your deaug bite?
User avatar
Fanatic
Posts: 1567
Joined: July 14, 2006, 11:39 pm
Location: Leesport, PA

Post by Fanatic »

Seems to me that I have seen a few smallblocks with 2 bosses on the block for the bushing. Don't know if I imagined this but might be worth a look.
INEPTOCRACY: (in-ep'-toc-ra-cy) : a system of government where the least capable to lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed are rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a diminishing number of producers.
User avatar
jmf66
Posts: 40
Joined: May 11, 2009, 11:01 am
Location: Franklin, TN

Post by jmf66 »

You want to be sure that the final position of the bottom rod is so that it is pushing straight on the clutch fork (in line with the trans). In other words, if the zbar is too high, the rod will push down on the clutch fork instead of straight back. This will cause wear on the bearing retainer and possible binding.
ICEMAN6166
Posts: 11470
Joined: July 11, 2006, 11:28 am
Location: Dove Creek, Co. elevation 6842
Poland

Post by ICEMAN6166 »

300/302 use a ball screwed into the block,
the rest have bolt on brackets with the ball welded on.
the ball pivots must be in line on both sides.
not all z arms are the same nor are all the brackets and lengths of pedal rod

since 302s were not offered in trucks until later it is possible one of those items needs to be from the donor year truck.
1966 F250 4x4
1964 Rambler Ambassador 990
Rest in peace departed Slick family members
Cam Milam
Lesley Ferguson
Steve Lopes
John Sutton
bluebolt
Posts: 841
Joined: November 18, 2007, 4:19 pm
Location: Benton LA

Frame mounts

Post by bluebolt »

Did you swap out the 3005 six frame mounts for 302 mounts? If not that's why its sitting high.
User avatar
cosmo
Posts: 157
Joined: November 20, 2007, 9:00 am

Answers..

Post by cosmo »

I did use new 302/351 mounts that I got from Flash Back F-100s. The screw in ball is from a 302. I did use solid motor mounts from Bronco grave yard...perhaps they are causing the engine to sit a little high....on inspection they look the same as the stock motor mounts. If the 351 did indeed use a bracket I'll buy one, I just need to know
MadMaxetc
Posts: 2600
Joined: July 10, 2006, 12:00 pm
Location: Wichita, KS
Contact:
United States of America

Post by MadMaxetc »

300 uses a stud in the bell.

302 uses a bracket on the bell.
Dan
Project: '63 F-100 LWB / 460 / C6 / 2x4
My Build Thread
Post Reply